11/15/2022 0 Comments Pianoteq 6 vs. ravenscroft![]() ![]() ![]() It doesn’t do polyphony well, and the sound will degrade with big arpeggiated chords and lots of pedaling (i.e.: Debussy). The problems I encounter seem to be a function of the limited resources of the (2018) iPad. It would help if the developer would provide some documentation, which I can’t seem to find anywhere. Otherwise the app is very usable and much better than most, especially for the money. Perhaps Ravenscroft can do something about this or let me know if I am missing something here. ![]() Acoustic pianos have continuous variable damper pedal control, but when using this app it does not send that function to the sustain pedal so it’s just basically on and off with a little bit of re-pedaling which can make the sound a bit choppy when using a sustain pedal. I like the expressiveness and control of the half-damper pedal which most lower and higher priced digital pianos now have internally. But as far as I can tell it’s missing half-damper pedal control when connected to a digital piano, and for me that’s a big issue. Beautiful, resonate sound with long damper pedal decay time and It has enough features to do most of the editing that I want. For an inexpensive acoustic piano app, this is certainly one of the best I’ve used on a digital piano or midi controller digital piano. I’ve also played hundreds of professional acoustic grand pianos. I play literally hundreds of Darius digital pianos with USB midi and audio connectivity. But, I still tend to favor the pianos in iGrand and SampleTank. I have several of the major acoustic pianos for IOS. The other shortcoming of iGrand is a 64 note polyphony limitation. But with careful blending of some reverb that can help, somewhat, in that area. Being some of the early releases of sampled pianos for IOS, they lack sympathetic resonance. I seriously feel I get a more satisfying result with several pianos from iGrand and SampleTank. The main thing this has going for it is sympathetic resonance. However, it still lacks a realistic hammer attack in the sound. I am now more satisfied with the resulting sound. It allows the full spectrum of the Ravenscroft 275 to come through. I replaced the Keystation 88 with the Nektar LX88+ which does have internal adjustment of velocity. That was totally dependent on the software. And this keyboard had no internal way to adjust the velocity sensitivity. Well, my M-Audio Keystation 88 began to have problems with a few keys loosing their velocity. And no matter how I adjusted the two Velocity parameters in the App I was disappointed. When I played with greater velocity it never seemed to deliver the percussive, brighter hammer action sound I felt it should have. When I first purchased Ravenscroft 275 I was quite disappointed with the sound. Information - Concerts, News,FAQs, Archives. Organs - Electronic (B3 etc.), Pipe, Theatre. ![]() Who's Who - Professional Pianists on Piano World Member Recordings - Non Classical Pianist CornerĮVENTS! Piano Concerts, Recitals, Competitions.įun Stuff! - Parties, Tours, Projects & More.įorum Members Parties, Tours, Cruises, & M. MY NEW PIANO or KEYBOARD! - Share Your Story! The Ivory is more of a factory preset someone else has presented you with, which if you don't like it straightaway, on the default settings, you probably still won't, even after an afternoon of fiddling around with the menu parameters.ĭigital Pianos - Electronic Pianos - Synths &a. Both are somewhat sonically flawed and frustrating, but the Ravenscroft software gives you more freedom to blend the ideal piano timbre of your personal preference. Besides also providing you the similar EQ and fine-tune adjustments anyway that you'd get from Ivory, once you've got your basic touch curve, overall EQ, brilliance, bass / treble ratio dialed in to your liking, which pretty much either never changes (for all piano VSTs you play) or is context dependent on the style of piano music you're trying to make, but is in all cases merely the broader brush-strokes, before the real subjective artistic piano-phile business of finding a piano timbre you're 95% satisfied with - which is a process of lengthy experiment and discovery with Ravenscroft and its 4 mic perspective mix sliders, whereas Ivory is a straight take-it-or-leave-it deal. The Ravenscroft has 4 different recorded multisamples, 4 different stereo mic perspectives, and 4 slightly different mic responses / acoustic path tonalities, 4 different fidelities of impulse transient capture, 4 different mic-to-instrument location distances, 4 different sonic soundscapes to play with or mix together. You can tweak it: brighter vs darker, harder vs softer, dry & clean or wet & resonant, shape the EQ, bias your touch curve, etc., etc., etc., but it's all basically just re-moulding the behaviour of the same recorded multi-samples from one stereo microphone characteristic. The Ivory II American D Steinway is basically one stereo multi-sample set. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |